Alright, of all the Fall 2013 fashion shows, this got the most polarized reactions. Just look at the photos at style.com and you'll see why.
Let's look at my favorite critique of the clothes, from Hedi Slimane's favorite gal, Cathy Horyn. LOL.
" One of the first things the new designer, Hedi Slimane, did was to
remove “Yves” from the label, thereby severing a symbolic connection to
the founder, and everything he stood for, like good taste and feminine
power.
Many people said the clothes looked like stuff sold at Topshop or a
thrift store, while others defended Mr. Slimane’s approach and
identified pieces, like a pink fur chubby, that relate back to Yves’s
designs of the late ’60s and early ’70s, when he got ideas — say, for a
pea coat — from the street. It’s doubtful that customers will make that
connection, but such comments serve to validate what Mr. Slimane has
done.
And the controversy is good for Saint Laurent. But mainly it was
clear to me how strong the name is. In terms of design, the clothes held
considerably less value than a box of Saint Laurent labels. Without the
label attached to them, Mr. Slimane’s grunge dresses wouldn’t attract
interest — because they’re not special. But a box of labels is worth a
million.
Hermès stands in sharp contrast to the Saint Laurent show and its lazy values."
Ouch! That hurt!
Meanwhile, let's look at a blogger, Man Repeller's Leandra Medine's review of the Saint Laurent show.
"Twitter reactions (based on the Saint Laurent hash tag and not on the
caliber of person posting) to Hedi Slimane’s second women’s
ready-to-wear collection for Saint Laurent included the following:
“What the hell is Hedi Slimane thinking?”
“Oh my dear Lord. Is this Saint Laurent, or an average girls high street wardrobe? I want to cry.”
“What the hell happened to YSL? I’ve seen people on skid row dressed better.”
“We did not need a Rachel Zoe x Marc Jacobs grunge resort collection.”
“Saint Laurent show, a huge joke on the fashion industry?”
“Women’s Wear Daily reports that Saint Laurent is relocating their
Paris studios. Hopefully they don’t tell Hedi where they’re going.”
I feel badly for Slimane. He’s had his ass handed to him by
effectively everyone–even his fans. For all the editorial reviews that
have tried to gather whatever beauty and raison d’etre is
evident in his collection, camps of protestors have shown up in virtual
armies at the comment feeds to refute the findings. Any comment of
praise has been met with a biting, “but,” and no matter how literate,
intellectual, articulate and authentic the positive reviews could have
been, it just doesn’t seem to matter.
It’s true that Slimane may be taking a liberal breadth of creative
license in his work for Saint Laurent, but if the re-branding and
subsequent dropping of the household ‘Yves’ in Saint Laurent last season
was an indication of anything, it was that Slimane’s vision would
likely differ phenomenally from that of the late Yves’. So, yes, Slimane
is certainly not to Saint Laurent what Raf Simons has proven to Christian Dior. But his creative departure from what’s expected at YSL can just as easily be viewed as a continuation of great House tradition.
In Alicia Drake’s book, The Beautiful Fall, a wonderful
portrayal mirroring the careers of Karl Lagerfeld and Yves Saint Laurent
in 1970s, Saint Laurent is credited as having popularized ready-to-wear
in 1966 as a means to “democratize fashion.” Lest we forget, Yves Saint
Laurent invented Le Smoking–a novel nod to androgynous dressing that
maintained the antiquated spirit of feminine elegance.
Isn’t this precisely what Slimane is trying to do? Appeal to a
different, perhaps larger, audience? The democratization of fashion at
YSL in 1966 is not so different from the shift we’re seeing at Saint
Laurent now. The underlying problem here, I believe, is that it seems
like we’re way past the point of democratization. (Especially,
when referring to a fashion house with such an extensive aura of
highbrow radiating around it).
The concept of ready-to-wear has migrated far away from the original
meaning of fashion-friendly “ready-to-wear,” and if the future of
ready-to-wear remains — for lack of a better term — ready to wear, should it be ready to wear now?
One of the most beautiful things in fashion is that element of
personal exploration. What is more refreshing than hating a collection
at first runway glance (case in point: Hedi Slimane for Saint Laurent,
season one) and finding yourself having grown to love it over the
interim before the clothes hit sales floors? That’s an astute testament
to evolving personal style, personal point of view, personal perception.
Ultimately, Slimane’s spring suiting, suede and those ineffable leather
jackets are the clearest indication that you can’t fake good fabric and
that you can’t fake authentic artistry.
And you know what? In spite of my having loved the Fall collection
(which, I did, and would effectively besiege the previous paragraph’s
sentiment), I wholly applaud the aspect of realism and Slimane’s
apparent hunger to modernize the brand.
Here’s the thing of it, though, I’m not Saint Laurent’s chic,
overwhelmingly wealthy, French customer; I’m a groupie on the sidelines.
So, what do I make of that? Does that chic, French customer even
actually exist anymore? Have people expressed violent disinterest in the
collection because it doesn’t appear to cater to that customer? Are we
afraid that this disheveled girl is the new prototypical woman? And is that a sad, difficult conclusion to draw? Yes, maybe we’re in denial.
Clearly, I’m confused. Please, impart your wisdom."
I have to say I'm with Cathy Horyn on this one. Yes, Leandra, people are not Saint Laurent chic, but shouldn't it be that if you're paying $3,000 for something it should be worth the money? You should sell a fantasy now. It's the fact that the high street is selling clothes that are even almost similar to high fashion that high fashion should now sell a dream. Alright, let's go to the grunge theme. How come Dries van Noten (Spring 2013) and Givenchy made almost very punk rock clothes look so divine and chic? I'm sure Hedi can do this too.
I don't know, what's your opinion guys? :)
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Monday, March 11, 2013
No Updates?
Sorry guys, I haven't been updating lately. I've been very busy at work. Don't worry, I haven't forgotten this yet! haha!
Anyways, Fall 2013 has arrived. And it's finished. Haven't even updated much about the Fashion shows.
Also, I'M ON INSTAGRAM!
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/itssomarkness
Follow me on Instagram: instagram.com/itssomarkness
GO! GO! GO!
Anyways, Fall 2013 has arrived. And it's finished. Haven't even updated much about the Fashion shows.
Also, I'M ON INSTAGRAM!
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/itssomarkness
Follow me on Instagram: instagram.com/itssomarkness
GO! GO! GO!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)